In my research, I came to the conclusion that a major shift clearly has taken place whereby dominion over some number of the assets of key areas of our space and / or low orbit capabilities have been reclaimed for more transparent military use by the public government of the United States under President Trump.

**

Space Force: Has a Truce Allowed Use of Assets Previously Restricted or Encumbered?  

I believe some sort of ‘truce’ or agreement is what is allowing the Space Force to come into fruition, fully. 

The promise of Space Force for the American population equates with new employment opportunities in technology and science, for the transparent expansion of the United States’ military domain, and for the advancement of scientific education in schools and universities. That’s because transparent, public expansion would likely open up a technology revolution.  

However, I feel that this is a revolution that has in large part already occurred in private. So the outflow of privatized scientific understanding and resources into the public arena, could potentially create a huge increase in economic activity and opportunity, and in more comprehensive education in the scientific realms at all levels of education.

Such an expansion should benefit the government, military, intelligence agencies, corporate players and the public as well.  If there is a bulk of activity that has occurred behind the scenes, the opening of some levels of transparency could be important to the national economy, to military and intelligence recruiting, to the education system, to national pride, and to the people of this country.

Beyond economic, national pride, and educational opportunities, the ability to transparently include the assets and operations of the US Space Force in national budgets represents the opportunity to bring fiscal accounting and operation command and effective administration back into line with the transparency our Constitution advocates and requires.

The status of our advanced technologies are a reflection of these forces: There has been an underlying tension and tug between what is privatized and classified, and what is public and transparent.

Even the fact that this situation has existed is still not widely known.  The key area it has been reflected in, in our national consciousness, is in UFOs. Those mysterious objects that fly through the sky – maybe they are from another planet in the solar system or galaxy – or maybe not.

As I postulated in my article What if UFOs are the Psyop?, perhaps this ‘extraterrestrial’ phenomena of metal UFOs in particular is a cover for our own human advanced technologies.

Now, that would be interesting, because the way this field of UFOs, and those participating in their study, are criticized and shunned is the perfect protection for advanced technological capabilities. Any unusual craft in the skies are a topic that no one with any degree of professional training or with any stake in entrenched careers will touch… sounds like the perfect protection and the perfect cover.

However, if the existence of working advanced technologies were more widely acknowledged, this would create significant momentum for transparency. I addressed a rational argument as to why it is likely that these capabilities exist in the article UFO Primer Part 2.

Again, this movement to transparency is nascent but strongly supported behind the scenes. We know this because the creation of the United States Space Force was announced at all.  

**

Significant powers were behind the development of advanced technologies by both our government, represented by the military and the intelligence agencies, by corporate forces vying for dominance and to win contracts, and potentially by a more shadowy element or rogue forces, somehow involved and pursuing their own agenda unknown to the public. 

We can conjecture that the combination of national security with the creation of powerful assets and capabilities, created a huge power structure sometimes at odds with, and balancing against, the public government.

It’s easy to judge this structure in hindsight. But let’s look back from a higher level view. We could argue that this had to happen this way, given the perceived need for secrecy and security, that then led to off-book and black budgets, and was reflected in obtuse government accounting. 

Catherine Austin Fitts and Mark Skidmore have tracked $21 trillion of off budget or unknown spending in two departments of the government, alone, for example, and Catherine estimates more than $20 trillion in additional spending may have occurred.  Some people do not understand that this money is not just lying around, waiting to be spent on new items. This money most likely financed significant national security or other infrastructure. According to Fitts, this means that under the US Constitution, we own it (the American public owns these off-book assets). 

However, these secret programs and capabilities were commanded in a highly classified and compartmentalized structure, and therefore the most likely effect is that it was hard to keep track of and it was hard to control, by the elected government.  

See this interview by Sara Westhall and Catherine Austin Fitts for more detail and information on this highly interesting and major yet practically unknown influence on the American economy and society.

Given the state of the United States government, including the corruption and the influence of both foreign, criminal and self-serving elements that has become obvious especially since the financial crash of 2008, who is to say that this wasn’t the best strategy to protect our assets and highly classified technology? 

What came first? Did the secrecy lead to corruption, or did the corruption create the secrecy? We simply don’t know at this point with the little information publicly available.  

To what extent was secrecy important to protect against unknown enemies? And to what extent did secrecy keep highly classified information out of the hands of corrupt or rogue actors? The answers at this point are unknown.

There is a lot of talk nowadays in general about the system being broken. We can counter that it appears what has been broken over some period of time are our laws, and that once the perception exists that laws are too frequently broken, the trust in our system erodes, as does the acceptance that classification always means national security, rather than political expediency or competitive position, is at stake.

However what we can wonder is whether transparency will bring assets and their use back into the correct balance, with the transparent public operation of constitutional governance.

And, we can assert that at this point, that it would appear that increased transparency is in the interest of national security, at the highest levels. 

Love, Solaris

*

If you resonate with my work, and with supporting an independent content creator, please

Please join my mailing list at Get the News – Join the Crew! so you can:

1) Get a monthly update listing all my content in one place.
2) Stay in touch independent of social media practices and policies.

Thank you!
Love, Solaris

© 2018 Solaris Modalis. All Rights Reserved.  Permission is given to share this article on other blogs and websites as long as the text is posted in its entirety without alteration and with the accompanying photos, and with the author’s credit, copyright and live website links included in the article. All photographs and videos created by Solaris Modalis are not retouched or manipulated:  color edits to images are specifically indicated if presented. This article was originally published at https://SolarisModalis.com/space-force-has-a-truce-allowed-use-of-assets-previously-restricted-or-encumbered.

Photograph free license from Unsplash.com by Elias Castillo.

The post Space Force: Has a Truce Allowed Use of Assets Previously Restricted or Encumbered? appeared first on Solaris Modalis.